-
WithoutRecourse
- 3 stars Rating: 56
895 votes total - (1837)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
WithoutRecourse
- 3 stars Rating: 56
895 votes total - (1837)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
Wild Turkey said...
Could you be any more myopic? Who gives a crap about the sack numbers? We're freaking 7-6 and our defense is ranked very low. I would trade at least half of those sacks for a better overall defense and a 10+ win season. Would you rather lead the nation in sacks and be 7-6 or have a lot less sacks, have a better defense, and actually ranked? As we've seen this year, the to don't necessarily go hand in hand. I could give a rat's patootie about sacks, I want W's.
-
thaeutychus ●
- 5 stars Rating: 95
1521 votes total - (3928)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Wild Turkey said...
Could you be any more myopic? Who gives a crap about the sack numbers? We're freaking 7-6 and our defense is ranked very low. I would trade at least half of those sacks for a better overall defense and a 10+ win season. Would you rather lead the nation in sacks and be 7-6 or have a lot less sacks, have a better defense, and actually ranked? As we've seen this year, the to don't necessarily go hand in hand. I could give a rat's patootie about sacks, I want W's.



#1 in sacks in country