Online Now 1149

Junction

On this Board 879
Record: 5117 (12/6/2012)

Online now 1149
Record: 5105 (2/14/2012)

Reply

Football Talk

  • Aubrey Bloom said...

    Yeah, I definitely agree with Clear's potential, can't wait for you guys to see him run routes at one of the scrimmages. The dude is absolutely massive but moves extremely well.

    I've read in the past he has had trouble catching the ball. Is he a reliable reciever now?

    bradwalk

  • Great discussion! I can't wait to see it all play out!

    BigDrizz42

  • bradwalk said...

    I've read in the past he has had trouble catching the ball. Is he a reliable reciever now?

    Not sure, haven't really seen him much yet.

    Email: AubreyBloom at gmail Follow On Twitter: Twitter.com/AubreyBloom247

    Aubrey Bloom

  • Good thread. Here's a link discussing diamond formation running and some of the teams that do it well.

    http://offensivebreakdown.blogspot.com/2011/01/diamond-formation.html

    I think McKinney wants to maximize the RB depth by increasing more diamond formations. Its no secret that Sumlin wanted more strong running game concepts in the offense after the LSU game. Thats why you saw more sprint option and diamond and broken diamond formations after that game and I think McKinney had a lot to do with that.

    Also, I think McKInney has better ways to run the ball with Johnny than Kliff did by running things like dash keep in the Cotton Bowl, rather than going 5 wide and QB draw we saw from Kliff.

    Phineas Gage

  • Thats no knock on Kliff. I just think Sumlin/McKinney have and will continue to stress running concepts since LSU and it plays to our strengths with and without Johnny.

    Phineas Gage

  • I think coaches tend to fall back to what they know best when the going gets tough. For Kingsbury, that's the passing game. He can mix in the run all he wants, but in his heart of hearts on a huge play he's usually going to lead toward the passing game. For McKinney, I think that's the run game.

    You see that a lot in basketball also. Like you said, it's not a knock on anyone really, It's just a difference of philosophy.

    Email: AubreyBloom at gmail Follow On Twitter: Twitter.com/AubreyBloom247

    Aubrey Bloom

  • Phineas Gage said...

    Good thread. Here's a link discussing diamond formation running and some of the teams that do it well.

    http://offensivebreakdown.blogspot.com/2011/01/diamond-formation.html

    I think McKinney wants to maximize the RB depth by increasing more diamond formations. Its no secret that Sumlin wanted more strong running game concepts in the offense after the LSU game. Thats why you saw more sprint option and diamond and broken diamond formations after that game and I think McKinney had a lot to do with that.

    Also, I think McKInney has better ways to run the ball with Johnny than Kliff did by running things like dash keep in the Cotton Bowl, rather than going 5 wide and QB draw we saw from Kliff.

    The QB draw was often a check against a 4 or 5 man box that Johnny made at the line. From watching it also seemed to be the alert play after a big gain. My point being Kliff didn't really call it as often as it got ran.

    The best play I've seen for a QB to run the ball in a while was the QB counter we ran from the broken diamond. I mean Kliff called that on 3rd and 23 against LA Tech and it turns into a long TD. That's supreme confidence in your play design on Kliff's part.

    You're right Aubs about Kliff reverting to the pass a lot. It was clearly his comfort zone. I think after LSU it became a constant tug of war between he and Sumlin to work the run more. Clearly Sumlin was right. If left unchecked KK would have no problem throwing the ball 60 times a game.

    signature image signature image signature image

    512ag