Online Now 664

Junction

On this Board 493
Record: 5117 (12/6/2012)

Online now 664
Record: 5105 (2/14/2012)

Reply

Zimmerman to be charged.

  • I have a problem with somebody being charged simply due to political pressure. If they were going to charge him, it should have been done in the beginning.

    George Zimmerman to be charged in Trayvon Martin shooting, official says - The Washington Post

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/george-zimmerman-to-be-charged-in-trayvon-martin-shooting-law-enforcement-official-says/2012/04/11/gIQAHJ5oAT_print.html

    www.washingtonpost.com
    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • I think he is being charged because he shot the other kid. I could be wrong though.

    signature image signature image

    mmmvegas

  • I don't see any chance of a conviction here, there is way too many ifs in the case. And with the way the Stand Your Ground Law is written in Florida, Zimmerman should be acquitted.

    GigEmJay85

  • Dont have time to read the article.. I think the evidence we knew from the get go was enough.. Forget race.. This was a kid.. Would you say this guy doesn't deserve to charged if that was your son? Not trying to start an argument, just asking.

    signature image

    Brenhams next star Darrion Johnson Class of 2014

    Brenhamhorn

  • Had to do it bit hell probably get off

    signature image signature image

    Status

  • Brenhamhorn said...

    Dont have time to read the article.. I think the evidence we knew from the get go was enough.. Forget race.. This was a kid.. Would you say this guy doesn't deserve to charged if that was your son? Not trying to start an argument, just asking.

    I have no problem with him being charged, but it should have been done in the beginning, and I don't like it happening because of politics.

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • Didnt another guy get convicted in Florida last year, after he tried to use that law?? They basically said since he had a weapon and the guy he killed didn't. He had no right.. Something like that

    signature image

    Brenhams next star Darrion Johnson Class of 2014

    Brenhamhorn

  • USMCAG said...

    I have no problem with him being charged, but it should have been done in the beginning, and I don't like it happening because of politics.

    I totally agree

    signature image

    Brenhams next star Darrion Johnson Class of 2014

    Brenhamhorn

  • Let me clarify, I think Zimmerman used excessive force in this incident. I also believe he was wrong in following Martin even after the police specifically told him not to. But the he-said she-said stories involved in this case will make it hard to get a conviction.

    GigEmJay85

  • Brenhamhorn said...

    I totally agree

    He could have walked away, and Trayvon would still be alive, I have a problem with that.

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • GigEmJay85 said...

    Let me clarify, I think Zimmerman used excessive force in this incident. I also believe he was wrong in following Martin even after the police specifically told him not to. But the he-said she-said stories involved in this case will make it hard to get a conviction.

    I agree Aggie Jay.

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • As long as he doesn't hire ole sausage wallet ethridge to defend him he should be alright.

    signature image signature image

    Status

  • Status said...

    As long as he doesn't hire ole sausage wallet ethridge to defend him he should be alright.

    [lol[ plus one for you!

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • with all the witnesses changing their stories and the he said/she said going on, I can understand why the police could not bring charges initially. the charges coming now just appear to be a response to the angry mob pressure and I don't like that one bit.

    LeonPhelps

  • LeonPhelps said...

    with all the witnesses changing their stories and the he said/she said going on, I can understand why the police could not bring charges initially. the charges coming now just appear to be a response to the angry mob pressure and I don't like that one bit.

    Yup, that's what I'm saying.

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • nm

    This post was edited by Ollie North on 4/11/2012 at 5:25 PM

    Ollie North

  • Ollie North said...

    what evidence are you using to determine excessive force?

    just funny that you can make those matter of fact statements with nothing but heresay and political propaganda....probably some wobbly legs to that stool you're trying to sit on.

    if you've seen the actual timeline of events and evidence they are going to use in court to convict Zimmerman I'm sure the board would love to see it....my guess is you haven't.

    nothing like getting convicted in the court of public opinion without having a clue as to the facts.

    Because he took the law into his own hands by following the young man after calling the cops. The police specifically told Zimmerman not to follow him and yet he still followed him. Had he not followed Martin, this situation would not have occurred. You're right about me not knowing the evidence, but common sense tells you that if he doesn't follow the kid, no altercation ensues.

    GigEmJay85

  • GigEmJay85 said...

    Because he took the law into his own hands by following the young man after calling the cops. The police specifically told Zimmerman not to follow him and yet he still followed him. Had he not followed Martin, this situation would not have occurred. You're right about me not knowing the evidence, but common sense tells you that if he doesn't follow the kid, no altercation ensues.

    The Police didn't tell him not to follow him, the dispatcher told him, which isn't a lawful order. I agree that he never should have followed him though.

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • Brenhamhorn said...

    Dont have time to read the article.. I think the evidence we knew from the get go was enough.. Forget race.. This was a kid.. Would you say this guy doesn't deserve to charged if that was your son? Not trying to start an argument, just asking.

    so what you're saying is kids can't commit crimes? How do you presume innocence based on age when teenagers commit crimes on a daily basis?

    And no I wouldn't want an innocent man (if he truly turns out to be) charged if my son was the perp.

    Look, I don't know the facts of the case, just like 99% of the rest of the American public....but you can't presume guilt or innocence based on age or he is someone's son.

    Ollie North

  • We don't know near enough for anyone to be making a decision whether he was guilty. We haven't been told the injuries to Zimmerman or Martin, there's been leaks of what witnesses said, but not everything, etc., etc. But he definitely deserved to be charged, IMO.

    Sin Miedo

  • nm

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Ollie North on 4/11/2012 at 5:25 PM

    Ollie North

  • But the dispatcher told him they did not need him to follow. It doesn't matter what his intent was, him following Martin was unnecessary.

    GigEmJay85

  • GigEmJay85 said...

    But the dispatcher told him they did not need him to follow. It doesn't matter what his intent was, him following Martin was unnecessary.

    I agree, he should have let the Police handle it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • Sin Miedo said...

    We don't know near enough for anyone to be making a decision whether he was guilty. We haven't been told the injuries to Zimmerman or Martin, there's been leaks of what witnesses said, but not everything, etc., etc. But he definitely deserved to be charged, IMO.

    So you admit you don't have a clue as to any of the facts, then state "he definitely deserved to be charged"

    That doesn't make a damn bit of sense.

    People are charged with committing a crime....up to this point no one has said what crime he has committed, so what are the charges supposed to be?

    The Sanford police dept have been saying the shooting falls under the "stand your ground" law so they wouldn't arrest him.....the special prosecuter Corey says she will charge him with the shooting death (not sure if manslaughter/murder).....I guess we'll see what the evidence says to defend both sides.

    George Zimmerman to be charged in Trayvon Martin shooting, official says - The Washington Post

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/george-zimmerman-to-be-charged-in-trayvon-martin-shooting-law-enforcement-official-says/2012/04/11/gIQAHJ5oAT_print.html

    www.washingtonpost.com

    Ollie North

  • With the facts I know an I'm sure I don't know all of them, it's a self defense case. Supposedly Zimmerman was getting his head bashed in by Martin, there is video evidence of zimmerman's head bleeding. He is 17 yrs oldand not so much a kid. I know 17 yr old that could beat the shit out of a 50 yr old, Prime example jay85. If the Martin Was punching him excessively and didn't seem to be stopping anytime soon then Zimmerman had every right to shoot him. What says that if Zimmerman wouldn't have shot him that he would be here today?

    signature image signature image signature image

    CTAG